The Hidden Blind Spots in Your Security Stack

Even mature organisations with expensive security tools face critical detection gaps that adversaries exploit daily.

Generic Detection Rules

Vendor-provided rulesets only detect basic Active Directory attacks. They miss environment-specific threats, sophisticated lateral movement, and modern C2 frameworks.

Default EDR Configurations

Out-of-box EDR settings provide baseline protection but fail against advanced techniques like process injection, LSASS dumping, or cloud-native attacks.

Alert Overload Without Context

Your SIEM generates thousands of alerts, but SOC analysts struggle to correlate events, prioritise threats, or distinguish real attacks from noise.

No Tailored Detection Logic

Critical business assets, privileged accounts, and high-value services lack specific detection coverage. Adversaries exploit this gap first.

Untested Incident Response

Your IR playbooks look great on paper, but have never been validated against real attack scenarios in your actual environment.

Unknown Dwell Time Risk

How long would an attacker remain undetected in your network? Without testing, you’re operating on assumptions, not evidence.

Our Threat-Informed SOC Effectiveness Testing

We don’t just scan your environment—we simulate real adversaries to reveal detection gaps, then collaborate with your team to build effective, custom detection capabilities.

Realistic Threat Simulation

We execute multi-stage attack killchains using MITRE ATT&CK techniques that mirror real threat actors:

  • Initial access via credential abuse and phishing techniques
  • Lateral movement using WMI, PowerShell remoting, and SMB exploitation
  • Privilege escalation targeting service accounts and local administrator rights
  • Persistence mechanisms (scheduled tasks, WMI event subscriptions, registry modifications)
  • Data exfiltration over DNS, HTTPS, and cloud storage
  • Modern C2 frameworks (Cobalt Strike, Sliver, custom tools)

Comprehensive Detection Gap Analysis

We monitor how your SOC, SIEM, and EDR respond to each attack phase:

  • Identify which techniques trigger alerts vs. go completely undetected
  • Analyse alert quality, context, and correlation capabilities
  • Map detection coverage against your threat model and critical assets
  • Document EDR configuration weaknesses and telemetry gaps
  • Assess SOC workflow efficiency and alert triage effectiveness

Purple Team Collaboration & Custom Rule Development

We work directly with your security team to close the gaps:

  • Develop environment-specific detection rules for your tech stack
  • Create custom logic for privileged account monitoring and lateral movement
  • Fine-tune EDR configurations and logging settings
  • Optimise SIEM correlation rules and alert thresholds
  • Provide detection engineering best practices and knowledge transfer
  • Collaborate with EDR vendors when needed for product improvements

Validation & Continuous Improvement

We re-test to confirm detection improvements are working:

  • Execute validation attacks to verify that new detection rules trigger correctly
  • Ensure alerts provide sufficient context for analyst response
  • Validate SIEM integration and workflow efficiency
  • Document detection maturity improvements and remaining gaps
  • Provide a 30-day follow-up consultation for ongoing optimisation

Threat Hunting Detection Rules

The rules are organised according to the MITRE ATT&CK framework and cover detection capabilities for Windows, Linux, macOS, cloud environments, and container platforms.

Proven Results Across Every Engagement

We’ve never completed an assessment without finding critical detection gaps. Here’s what organisations typically discover:

100%

Of assessments uncover detection blind spots in “mature” environments

95%+

Attack scenarios go undetected with default EDR configurations

2%

Average detection rule trigger rate during Purple Team exercises

47

Undetected persistence mechanisms per assessment

“We thought our EDR and SIEM were protecting us. Tenendo’s testing revealed that 95% of their simulated attacks went completely undetected. They didn’t just find the problems—they helped us build custom detection rules that actually work.”

Scenario: A European financial institution with mature SOC operations, leading EDR solution, and SIEM platform wanted to validate its detection capabilities before DORA compliance deadlines.

23 Initial Access Attempts
21 Undetected

34 Lateral Movement Events
33 Undetected

47 Persistence Mechanisms
All Undetected

156 Custom Detection Rules
Developed & Deployed

Outcome: After Purple Team collaboration and custom rule development, detection coverage improved from 5% to 87% across tested killchains. The EDR vendor incorporated Tenendo’s recommendations into their product roadmap, benefiting their entire customer base.

Comprehensive Deliverables & Support

You receive actionable intelligence, not just another report to file away.

Executive Summary

Business-focused overview of detection gaps, risk exposure, and improvement roadmap for C-level stakeholders and board presentations.

Technical Assessment Report

Detailed analysis of every attack technique tested, EDR/SIEM response, detection gaps, and specific configuration recommendations.

Custom Detection Rules Catalogue

Environment-specific detection logic, SIEM queries, EDR configurations, and correlation rules ready for immediate deployment. MITRE ATT&CK mapped.

Purple Team Exercise Documentation

Complete walkthrough of attack scenarios, defensive responses, collaboration outcomes, and knowledge transfer sessions with your SOC team.

Prioritised Remediation Roadmap

Risk-ranked action plan with quick wins, medium-term improvements, and long-term strategic enhancements to your detection posture.

30-Day Follow-Up Consultation

Included support for rule tuning, false positive reduction, and validation testing after implementation. Remote or on-site options available.

Stop Guessing. Start Validating.

Book a 30-minute consultation to discuss your SOC effectiveness testing needs. No sales pitch—just an honest assessment of whether this service is right for you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Traditional pentests focus on finding vulnerabilities to exploit. SOC Effectiveness Testing focuses on validating your detection and response capabilities. We assume breach and test whether your SOC can detect, respond to, and contain sophisticated attacks. It’s Purple Team focused, not just offensive red team work.

Having security tools doesn’t mean they’re configured optimally or are detecting real threats. Default configurations miss 95%+ of advanced techniques. We test your actual detection capabilities against real adversary behaviour, not theoretical scenarios.

No. We coordinate closely with your team to execute tests safely during agreed-upon timeframes. All testing is conducted with full visibility and control. We can work in isolated test environments or production with appropriate safeguards.

Typically 2-5 weeks, depending on scope: 2 weeks for core testing and initial gap analysis, 2-3 weeks for Purple Team collaboration and custom rule development. We include 30-day follow-up support for implementation assistance.

Yes. Our methodology aligns with DORA requirements for threat-led testing and can be structured to support TIBER-EU compliance. We provide documentation suitable for regulatory submissions.

This is precisely why many organisations need this service. We minimise the burden on your team while maximising knowledge transfer. Our Purple Team approach means we collaborate efficiently without overwhelming your analysts.

Yes, when beneficial. We’ve successfully collaborated with major EDR vendors (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender, etc.) to improve detection capabilities—not just for our client, but for their entire customer base.